"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
10/05/2017 at 16:02 • Filed to: anti-destination league
21
20|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
10/05/2017 at 16:02 • Filed to: anti-destination league | 21
| 20 |
Or frankly anyone who wishes to arrive at their destination in a timely manner.
someassemblyrequired
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:06 |
|
Bonus points if any of the drivers were wearing fedoras.
Milky
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:07 |
|
20 year old GM sedans are routinely driven by the most clueless and careless drivers. Best to just fall back to a safe distance.
Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:11 |
|
Behold an occasion where it is acceptable to pass at the next ramp.
Chariotoflove
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:16 |
|
I think this photo is fake because none of the turn signals is on.
Nothing
> someassemblyrequired
10/05/2017 at 16:19 |
|
Or if there are any white baseball caps or straw hats sitting in the rear window package tray area.
Demon-Xanth knows how to operate a street.
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:23 |
|
I travel every day on a road where drivers cannot for the life of them keep a constant speed unless you do one crucial thing: Put another driver in the lane beside them. Then it becomes pace laps at NASCAR. Nobody can pass anyone and even traffic lights don’t break the rolling road block. I mean, you’re telling me that the Chevy Tahoe, and that Toyota Corolla just HAPPEN to have the exact same comfortable speed to the point that you have forty feet of variance over the course of three miles?
WilliamsSW
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:25 |
|
If I go to hell when I die, this is what it will be.
BritishLeyland™
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:25 |
|
Ah yes, but just look how stately and classy they look while obstructing traffic.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> someassemblyrequired
10/05/2017 at 16:26 |
|
They were all like 95,000 years old.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> BritishLeyland™
10/05/2017 at 16:29 |
|
...sure Jan.
TheHondaBro
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:29 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Mid Engine
> Nothing
10/05/2017 at 16:45 |
|
full sized Kleenex boxes nestled up against the rear window
Urambo Tauro
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:48 |
|
Alright, whose bright idea was it to impose a 60mph speed limit on a limited-access divided highway where there’s not even a construction zone?
|
Chariotoflove
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 16:51 |
|
I have to add, this reminds me of the rolling road blocks the Dallas police tried several years back. Squad cars would line up across all lanes and go the speed limit. Incredibly, lots of impatient people would actually zoom around them on the shoulder and/or honk in complaint.
The undercurrent of entitlement around here is incredible.
Shamoononon drives like a farmer
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 17:13 |
|
Yeah, but I was stuck behind three bicyclists (the spandex kind) for 5 miles on my way to work when the three of them decided to take the whole lane up. This is a winding road, one lane per directions... I didn’t honk because I was curious how long it would take them to get in a single file line. They never did.
RiceRocketeer Extraordinaire
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 17:14 |
|
aka the Anti-Destination League
|
Shamoononon drives like a farmer
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 17:14 |
|
The brake lights... my lawd.
Steve in Manhattan
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 17:34 |
|
Bet all their left blinkers were on ...
Die-Trying
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 19:09 |
|
i think that i can see thee gaps there i could fit a car through.....
AdverseMartyr
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/05/2017 at 19:53 |
|
Are you sure this isn’t a segment for the Grand Tour?